Feed Icon  

Contact

  • Bryant Likes
  • Send mail to the author(s) E-mail
  • twitter
  • View Bryant Likes's profile on LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
Get Microsoft Silverlight
by clicking "Install Microsoft Silverlight" you accept the
Silverlight license agreement

Hosting By

Hot Topics

Tags

Open Source Projects

Archives

Ads

Workflow 2.2 Available!

Posted in ASP.Net/Web Services | WF at Monday, 01 May 2006 03:17 Pacific Daylight Time

From WindowsWorkflow.Net:

Windows Workflow Foundation Beta 2.2 is now available for download on MSDN at this location. Please note that this release is not compatible with the February CTP of WinFx and must be installed on a machine without the February CTP. For more details, please refer to the installation instructions. While this installation is marked as the "Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 Extensions for Windows Workflow Foundation Beta 2.2", it contains the runtime and documentation components as well.

Hmm... I hope this doesn't mean I have to flatten everything and start over just to install this update. However, this is exciting since it should include the ASP.Net asynchronous background workflow support I was looking for.

Update: You can upgrade to this version by following the instructions. However, I misread Paul's post about "functionality was added after beta 2.2 was released" [emphasis mine]. I read that and thought it was going to be in 2.2. :)

Update2: I don't know why this suddenly appeared as new to me when it has been out for quite some time! For some reason when I went to the homepage it looked different so I thought it was a newer release. I guess I have to have a good laugh at my own expense from time to time. :)

Tuesday, 02 May 2006 03:58:23 (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
Well at least you didn't yank your post and instead poked a little fun at yourself Bryant... I have to admit I did wonder exactly what you were talking about a new beta 2.2 for when in fact, it was an old beta. =)
Tuesday, 02 May 2006 04:08:10 (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
Funny thing is that ActiveWin also published this "news". <BR><BR><A href="http://www.activewin.com/awin/comments.asp?HeadlineIndex=34723&Group=1" target=_new rel=nofollow>http://www.activewin.com/awin/comments.asp?HeadlineIndex=34723&Group=1</A> <BR><BR>Makes me wonder if they picked it up from me or if someone else made the same mistake. :)
Tuesday, 02 May 2006 09:53:31 (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00)
*laughing* I just saw it on ActiveWin and came here to add another comment myself...
Comments are closed.